A Compilation of Real Videos of Stars and the Wandering Stars (aka Planets)

Here is a compilation of real people taking real videos of the stars and of the planets, which were called the “wandering stars” in the past.

A lot of these videos are taken with the Nikon P900 video camera, which as far as I know has the strongest zoom capabilities available on the market to the public.

It should be clear to anyone who is willing to break out of their conditioning that these stars are not burning Suns quadrillions of miles away.

For one thing, if a star was really 642.5 “light years” away, which is  3.77702e+15 miles, — which is how far away “scientists” and “astronomers” say Betelgeuse is (lol!) — how would it be possible to go from zero-zoom to the relative closeness that can be achieved with a simple Nikon P900 zoom camera? We would not be able to achieve such closeness if the stars were really that far away.

Heliocentrists have theorized that the star Sirius is 8.611 light years away, or 50.62 trillion miles away (lol again!). See below the first video in this collection. Sirius is not 50 trillion miles away (wow, I just chuckled again as I typed that insane number), and it is not a fire-y ball of nuclear reactions.

If this is your first time seeing a real video of stars and you feel amazed, weird, a little bit confused, a little bit angry, a sense that you have found something true, or maybe even a combination of all of these emotions and a whole lot more, then congratulations, you are having exactly the right reaction to this “new” (yet ancient and timeless), matrix-breaking discovery.

What are these stars? Who knows… They are an incredible mystery, and part of the mystery is unraveling the lies we have been force-fed about what they really are.

We are supposed to explore our stars. Not through books written by liars, but with our own eyes.  They are closer than we realize. We’ve been taught to not look up, but instead to believe what has been forced down our throats without investigating for ourselves. No wonder the world is in the state that it’s in. And by the way, No, reading a book by Stephen Hawking or Bill Nye or Carl Sagan and swallowing everything in it is not “investigating for yourself.”

Enjoy this compilation of videos. Hopefully I will continue to add to the collection as I find them and as time allows…

Advertisements

Former Professor and Astronomer at University of Cambridge Admits He Cannot Prove Ball Earth (Quote)

“When we consider what the advocates of the Earth’s stationary and central position can account for, and explain the celestial phenomena as accurately to their own thinking as we can ours, in addition to which they have the evidence of their senses and scripture and facts in their favor, which we have not; it is not without a show of reason that they maintain the superiority of their system… However perfect our theory may appear in our own estimation, and however simply and satisfactorily the Newtonian hypotheses may seem to us to account for all the celestial phenomena, yet we are here compelled to admit the astounding truth, if our premises be disputed and our facts challenged, the whole range of Astronomy does not contain one proof of its own accuracy.”

~ Dr. Robert Woodhouse (1773 – 1827) English Mathematician, Cambridge Astronomer, Fellow of the Royal Society

Fake SpaceX Launch of Roadster into “Space”

Look, even if you don’t want to see that the Earth is a plane and not a sphere, I urge you to at least not believe this Elon Musk hoax. This video shows that they had a green-screen CGI glitch as the roadster was cruising through space over the Earth.

And Yes, that crowd that you see there cheering is part of the hoax, intended to cement the illusion. Either they are paid actors… or they are genuine useful idiots who believe that they are witnessing a real launch… or a combination of both (this one gets my vote).

Good News Folks… No One Died in the “Las Vegas Shooting Massacre”

This newest mass shooting incident that supposedly took place in Las Vegas has all the tell-tale signs of a staged drill using crisis actors. What’s really strange is that if I went up to some stranger on the street and said something like, “I’ve got good news for you. No one actually died in Las Vegas. Or at Sandy Hook. Or at (you fill in the blank with your favorite hoax)”… if I said that, that person I’m talking to would fly off the handle, to put it delicately. I mean, wouldn’t that be great news to hear that nothing actually happened… that it was a drill? No, most people get so attached to the emotions that the media stirs in them as part of these events (it’s always the same old script), that they don’t want to let them go, and they would rather continue to believe that people died than consider that it was a hoax and that no one was actually hurt.

I’m not going to do a whole lot of research on this. I’ve already seen all of this a dozen times before at least. This video here from CNN is just something I found during a cursory look at the mainstream news. Check out the girl on the left express “duper’s delight” after the host asks her first question. She kind of laughs and smiles, and then all of a sudden gets back into character so that she properly appears sad. She cannot hide her delight in trying to pull one over on people, or perhaps she’s just embarrassed by the whole situation. She’s an actress, and so is her friend. And the B.S. story they tell is a laughably bad script. And just watch the interviewer asking the questions (if you can do it without throwing up). These are actors and actresses and this is nothing more than a scripted hoax.

Also, I can’t find one photograph that shows a lot of blood or a dead body. I did find one on CNN of a woman lying face first on the ground with some guy lying over her… but yet in the caption, which very few will read, it said something like, “This woman reportedly was able to get up and walk away.” All they have are a bunch of photographs of chaotic looking scenes, but there is no real carnage because there were no real deaths.

Here’s a good video, I thought, that makes some good points: it talks about how the guy brought 23 guns or whatever the number is to his hotel room, which is a “cartoonish” number of guns. Why would a perpetrator need so many guns? The video also talks about how the narrative right after the shooting is talking about the need for greater hotel security, which would be a huge cottage industry. Another good point is that the reason to pull off this hoax, generally speaking, is just as a pretext to take away more freedoms… whatever form that may take, that’s the bottom line.

Check out this video this guy who supposedly saved 30 lives. Wait, wait, wait… first of all, how exactly did he save 30 people? There are zero details as to what he did to save 30 people. Did he just yell, “Take cover!”, and then 30 people were counted as heeding his advice? But the biggest thing I want to point out here is that it says that this hero was “shot in the neck.” (I also saw another video of him saying that he sustained other injuries… one being a cracked rib or something like that.) If you watch, they even go into detail about how the police officer who saved this “hero” put his finger in the hole of the neck wound to stop the bleeding. I just have a slight problem here: Why in the world does he look just fine and dandy, with perhaps the healthiest looking neck ever? I see no signs of this man being shot in the neck. And no problems moving the neck either after being shot and having a hole big enough to put a finger in it. The only answer to this problem is that he wasn’t shot. He’s a crisis actor, and if you watch the video, he’s a typical bad one at that.

lasvegas

 

The Theory of Evolution is a Monstrous Deception (Quote)

Ali Demirsoy“The probability of the coincidental formation of cythochrome-C, just one of the essential proteins for life, is as unlikely as the possibility of a monkey writing the history of humanity on a typewriter without making any mistakes … Some metaphysical powers beyond our definition must have acted in its formation.”

~ Ali Demirsoy, Turkish Biologist, Professor, and “Evolutionary Biology” Expert

Theodor Herzl on Using Antisemitism as Controlled Opposition (Quote)

Theodor Herzl“It is essential that the sufferings of Jews become worse… this will assist in the realization of our plans. I have an excellent idea… I shall induce antisemites to liquidate Jewish wealth… The antisemites will assist us thereby in that they will strengthen the persecution and oppression of Jews. The antisemites shall be our best friends.”

~ Theodor Herzl, Austro-Hungarian political activist, writer, father of modern political Zionism

Flat Earth Perspectives Q&A Interview

I was contacted by a Spanish journalist who wanted to interview me about Flat Earth. He sent me some questions, which I answered, but it appears that he probably will not use my answers in his article.

Since I don’t want to have completely wasted my time, I thought I would post this little Q&A here on the blog…

May I ask you your sex/age?

I am a male, age 40.

Have you a university degree?

Yes, I have a 4-year Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science.

What is your daily job?

I work for a small non-profit organization in the Western United States.

When did you start with your blog?

I started my blog, entitled Flat Earth Perspectives, in February of 2016. I don’t consider it to be anything special. I’m just an ordinary guy trying my best to present this information.

Why did you launch it?

That’s a good question. When I first started looking into this “Flat Earth” issue, there were so many pieces of evidence and ideas out there that I found it difficult to organize all of them in my own head. And so I started my blog to help me organize my thoughts on the subject and to help me understand them. After a person discovers the flat earth ideas, even though there might be an instant sensing that you are finally seeing or hearing the truth, it still does take a while for the ideas to sink in because of all the past globe-earth conditioning. Although the blog currently has a pretty good amount of information, it is far from being a complete Encyclopedia of the flat earth topic. There is still much more to cover. I also launched the blog so that others might learn of this.

You told me in our email exchange, “One is considered insane for even considering Flat Earth, and yet it happens to be the truth”? Have you experienced this sort of backlash?ae-equidistant-projection-flat-earth

Yes, I have witnessed and experienced the ridicule that people have toward the subject of “flat earth.” Although I have not really been attacked personally or called “insane” directly, I have watched the reactions of people around me when the idea is brought up. Most people consider the subject to be completely ridiculous, not far from believing in the Easter Bunny or Santa Claus. I also thought Flat Earth was ridiculous before I started to look into it. The subject is intensely ridiculed and there is often even anger towards the idea. There is anger because people don’t want to even consider that they have been so thoroughly fooled, or that so many people that they previously trusted — so-called scientists, teachers, authority figures, etc. — have been purposefully lying or have been fooled themselves.

Do you speak your views on this subject with the people around you (family, friends…)?

Yes, I have spoken to a couple of family members and several friends about the subject. In general I do not speak about it because it is such a touchy subject, but I have introduced the topic to people who I have known to be willing to question what they have learned. After you discover flat earth, it is hard to keep it to yourself, and so you feel compelled to share with at least one other person. In general, the people who I have talked to have been able to consider the evidence with an open mind, but I leave it to them to draw their own conclusions.

Could you explain briefly what is the main idea regarding the earth that you present in your blog?

earthsI guess the main idea is that humanity has been lied to for centuries about the shape of the Earth, and that there is not one shred of physical, experiential, scientific, empirical evidence that the Earth is a sphere — all that globe earth theory has are fake images and outlandish, unproven theories. Meanwhile, there are hundreds upon hundreds of common sense, observable flat earth “proofs” that blow the ball-earth theory out of the water. It is all a matter of overcoming a lifetime of conditioning. I had to overcome it as well. But once you begin to break out of the conditioning, a whole lot of things about the current state of our world begin to make much more sense. The globe-earth deception is the biggest hoax of all time. It is a wide-ranging subject that effects more aspects of our lives than most people would imagine. It’s about more than just “the shape of the earth.”

What is the basis that you have to justify that earth is flat?

This is a difficult question to answer in just a short paragraph or two or three. There are hundreds of what we call “flat earth proofs.” Some of these proofs are direct or circumstantial evidence that we live on a plane as opposed to a sphere. Others are proofs in the sense that they expose the ball-earth lies. For instance, if I am able to show that NASA is trying to pass off a computer generated image as a real photo, then that is a proof in the sense that it shows a government agency lying to people about the shape of the Earth. All true flat earth proofs appeal to common sense in my opinion. Here are a couple of my favorite proofs…

No matter how high you go up into the air in a plane or in a hot-air balloon, the distant horizon always rises to the eye-level of the observer, and it is always perfectly horizontally flat all 360 degrees around the observer, showing absolutely no curvature. If the Earth were a ball, then the horizon would not rise to eye-level, and at some point the observer would have to look down to see the horizon.

I think my favorite flat earth proof is that Polaris, also known as The North Star, never moves from it’s position above the North Pole. The North Star always remains stationary, and all of the other stars make circular paths around it. If it was as the mainstream theory says, that stars are all suns and that they have all been moving at incredible Star_trails_over_the_ESO_3.6-metre_telescopespeeds through space for millions of years, then how could The North Star remain stationary relative to our observation point, and how could all of our stars make the same circular path around The North Star night after night, year after year? In addition, if all of these so-called “suns” are supposedly moving outward into space, how would it be possible that all of the stars in all of the constellations would remain in the same relative positions to one another throughout the history of humanity? In other words, wouldn’t the constellations as we know them change their shapes? So this means that the stars are not suns, and they are not traveling through “outer space” like we have been told by “science.”

Another one of my favorite proofs is that the high Northern Latitudes and the high Southern Latitudes have drastically different kinds of animal and plant life, and therefore different climates. If the Earth were a ball, then the same relative Northern and Southern latitudes would have similar amounts of life because both poles of the ball earth would be exposed to the Sun the same amount of time as the Earth revolves around the Sun in space. The actual fact is that high Southern latitudes have surprisingly little life, it is very desolate… while the Northern latitudes are surprisingly vibrant with life, with a longer period of relatively warm Summer than most people think.

When was the first time you heard or read about this?

The first time I heard about flat earth theory was about 18 months ago when I ran across it on the internet. I was investigating another hoax on someone’s website, and I noticed that he kept referring to flat earth. At first I laughed at it just like most people. Then for some reason — I can’t remember why, maybe just for a laugh? — I looked into the material he was presenting and I was blown away by the evidence. I knew I was seeing the truth, and yet still I was thinking to myself, “Am I crazy?” This is one reason why you feel compelled to tell others about this… just to make sure you’re not the only one who can see it.

How do you explain that the majority of people think that they know that the earth is a spheroid?

I have covered that a little bit already in a previous answer, but most people believe that they live on a ball-earth because they have been bombarded with ball-earth propaganda since the moment they were born — globes in the classroom, images from NASA, the Universal Studios trademark… it’s endless. It is very difficult to convince someone to take a look at evidence that is contrary to something that they believe so strongly, especially if it means that they have been duped. People don’t want to believe that they are so easily duped. People also don’t want to believe that there are those who could be so evil that they would deceive all of humanity for their own ends. Most people who believe that the Earth is a sphere probably could not tell you why they believe it… they would probably say something like, “Well, I’ve seen the pictures of the ball Earth from space. Of course it’s a globe.” But what they don’t know is that all of those images of a globe Earth are faked. Every last one of them.