If you were to ask the average person on the street, “How are international internet communications handled?”, I would guess that the majority of people would answer, “Satellites.” I know that I would have said the same thing before I discovered the flat earth topic.
It turns out that 99% of “transoceanic data traffic” — this includes internet data, phone calls, and text messaging — is transported via undersea cables. That figure of 99% is even admitted by mainstream media. Check out this article from April of 2015 from Newsweek.
OK, so an elite-owned media property like Newsweek is admitting this, which tells me that it’s most likely 100%. It also tells me that satellites do not exist in so-called “space.” If satellites are responsible for a mere 1% of data at most, then why would they even be used at all? Why wouldn’t every bit of international data be transported via undersea cables? Why save 1% for these apparently near-useless and outdated “satellites”, which if you read the article above are eight times slower than undersea cables? (They’re not really 8x slower because they don’t exist.) And yet, a lot of people would probably answer “satellites” to the question above.
Also, if you take a look at a globe-earth model map of these undersea cables, you see some anomalies. For instance, why do there appear to be so few cables that are run through the so-called Southern Hemisphere? Is it because the globe-earth map is not accurate? Would all of these lines make more sense as direct straight line paths on a flat-earth model map? Why not go straight from New Zealand to Chile, for instance?
Here below is Gleason’s New Standard Map of the World if you’d like to compare the undersea cable routes on the two different maps. Compare the connection from New Zealand to Chile in South America, for example. Another good example are the undersea cables from what appears to be Montevideo in Uruguay (the southern-most point on the east coast of South America in which the cable line begins), then moving north to the city of Natal in Brazil (the eastern-most point of South America), over to the western-most point of the African continent, and from there down to South Africa — why not go straight from Montevideo to South Africa — you will see that this routing makes much more sense on the flat earth map.
“If you’re not careful, the newspapers will have you hating the people who are being oppressed, and loving the people who are doing the oppressing.”
~ Malcolm X, Born in 1925, assassinated in 1965
“In no country has the historical blackout been more intense and effective than in Great Britain. Here it has been ingeniously christened The Iron Curtain of Discreet Silence. Virtually nothing has been written to reveal the truth about British responsibility for the Second World War and its disastrous results.”
~ Harry Elmer Barnes, American Historian (1889-1968)
“If you find from your own experience that something is a fact and it contradicts what some authority has written down, then you must abandon the authority and base your reasoning on your own findings.”
~ Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci, Italian inventor, painter, sculptor and scientist (1452-1519)
“The American people don’t believe anything until they see it on television.”
~ Richard Nixon, 37th President of the United States, and pretty much universally recognized liar and crook, even by those who believe that the two sides of the American political spectrum are actually competing against each other. This quote is probably one of the most honest things he ever said.
It is claimed from “official sources” that a “V-2 Missle” was launched from the New Mexico desert on October 24, 1946, and that it took this black-and-white photo below. Supposedly this photo was taken at an altitude of 65 miles.
(Image source: whotfetw.com)
This photo shows a completely flat horizon… no curvature whatsoever. Notice how they present the photo at an angle in order to give this sort of slight illusion of curvature. But if you hold up a straight edge to the horizon line in the photo, you will see that the horizon is a completely straight line.
Just in case you think this photo has been doctored by “conspiracy theorists,” click the following link to see the same photo presented on “Air and Space Magazine’s” website, which is run by the “Smithsonian,” which is obviously a controlled mainstream media outlet: First Photo From Space. Check out the “panorama” that they put together from a 1948 V-2 photo-shoot. They added some curvature to some of these photos to make sure that you know that the Earth is a globe.
I do believe that this photo is most likely real, and I do believe that they really could have been 65 miles up in the air. But this “missle” is not in “space” as they claim. It is in Earth’s atmosphere. So what they’re trying to accomplish two things in this fake article: convince you that there is such a thing as “no-atmosphere space,” and that the shape of the earth is a sphere (of course it’s supposedly “pear-shaped” now!).
Also, one more point I wanted to make… this photo was supposed snapped in 1946, but it is a whole photo, not a composite. And now here we are in 2016 — 70 years later — and NASA claims that the available technology in all of their various cameras and satellites only allows them to take small snapshots that they then have to piece together to form a whole, composite shot. I guess that the “technology” was better in 1946, and has regressed since then…