Instances of NASA Hoaxes, Fakery and Deception

Do you actually believe that this contraption below was able to land on the Moon? And since NASA is lying about that, how can we believe anything they say? If they have the audacity to lie on a scale that large, doesn’t it then call into question everything they have ever said and done? Their claim that the Earth is a ball, for instance? And then doesn’t it follow logically that we then have to question the motives of any so-called “scientist,” government official, or anyone in a position of authority who has touted the goodness of NASA?

Lunar Landing Module Hoax

NASA Moon landing hoax

If you examine these two supposed images of Jupiter, one from 2014 and one from 2016, you will see that the cloud formations on the this giant so-called “planet” did not change in two years. I don’t know, maybe “gravity” explains why that is, as it seems to explain everything else. And check out that fake, magical, electrical light-show thing going on in the 2016 image. They really think we’re dumb (unfortunately, they’re kind of right about that).

Fake images of Jupiter

This meme below is self-explanatory. It is actually admitted by everyone that 99% of all international internet communications are handled by a vast network of undersea cables — check out my article about that here. If you asked most people how internet signals were handled across oceans, they would say “satellites.”

Arthur C. Clarke satellite fraud

In this image below, the famous supposed photo of Neil Armstrong’s first footprint on the Moon does not match the sole on the foot of his official spacesuit that is on display… not even close in fact.

Neil Armstrong fake moon landing

Here below is a press conference following the return of the first astronauts to land on the Moon. Are they just tired? Or are they tired of lying?

Apollo 11 press conference

How exactly would a rocket thruster work in the vacuum of space? And by the way, at what magical point does the atmosphere of Earth turn into the airless vacuum of space?

Fake space rockets

Fake space rockets

And here is lying free mason Buzz Aldrin being corrected as to how the Lunar Module worked. You’d think he would know that contraption inside-out, wouldn’t you?

Buzz Aldrin lying

And if you did not know, astronaut Gus Grissom was murdered after he stated publicly that basically there was no way we were going to land on the moon anytime soon. Here’s the story in a very brief nutshell…

Gus Grissom murdered by NASA

The image below shows the fact that you can adjust the lighting levels in Photoshop in some of NASA’s official photos, and you can clearly see cropping outlines (and lazy ones at that) which show that images have been pasted into the photo. In the case below, a fake image of the ball Earth has been pasted into the photo.

NASA photoshop fakery

NASA claims that they slow down the landing module with parachutes. No, really, that’s what they claim.

Slow down with parachutes

They expect us to believe that they had time to play some golf on the Moon, but not much time for taking very many photos.

Golf on the Moon

There have been multiple instances in which NASA astronauts and even President of the United States Barrack Obama have made strange comments revolving around the idea that we are only “able to fly in low Earth orbit. That’s the farther we can go.” Wait… what? Didn’t NASA travel to the Moon at a supposed distance from Earth of 238,900 miles, which is way past “low Earth orbit.” And by the way, there’s no such thing as “low Earth orbit.” Are they basically admitting that it never happened? That it was a hoax?

Can get past low earth orbit

An outline of the Disney character “Pluto” can actually be seen on an official image from NASA of the so-called planet Pluto.

Fake planet Pluto

Nikon P900 Digital Camera Zooming-In on Toronto Skyline (Video)

Taken from 30.84 Miles away at Fort Niagara, NY. The Rogers Center dome is only 282′ high. Lake Ontario elevation is 243′.The base elevation of the Rogers Center is 267′, making the total height of the Rogers Center above the lake 306′ . My elevation was 6′ above the lake. Expected curvature is 516.85′ of drop. Rogers Center should not have been visible. The Rogers Center, formerly know as Sky Dome, is the bright white building to the left of the famous CN Tower. From over 30 miles away, it should be below the Earth’s supposed curvature. The temperature of Toronto, Fort Niagara, and Lake Ontario were all within 5 degrees difference from each other and the humidity of the air in between did not exceed 40%. (Description from Jenna Fredo’s YouTube Channel. Check out her channel here.)

Did you know that there’s no such thing as “outer space”?

This meme below inspired me to make this post. There is no such thing as the “outer space” that we have been conditioned to believe in by charlatans who claim to be scientists. A “scientist” is someone who records data taken from direct observation, not someone who makes assumptions, then calls those assumptions facts, and uses that so-called fact as the basis for more and more so-called facts and theories.

Space Fraud

Observe this video below of a supposedly successful rocket launch. This is the very first video I chose, and it does exactly what the meme above depicts, which is that after initial launch, the rocket slowly goes horizontal, and then you can actually see it tilt back down. Yes… down, not up.

And then at about the 2:12 mark there is a convenient video edit that cuts to a view of the rocket showing a curved earth, but it is likely a fish-eye lens that bends the image. If you’re a flat earther, you already know that they use fish-eye lenses all the time to try to fool us into believing that we are seeing curvature.

Note the official-sounding conversation we’re hearing of the “scientists” and “technicians” who are overseeing this immensely important asteroid probe launch (what a joke that is). And note also that this launch is at night — could this be so that it isn’t so obvious that the rocket is just making a giant parabola and then coming back down into the ocean?

“What goes up, must come down”… sing it!

The History of Flat Earth (Video by Eric Dubay)

Is Eric Dubay a genuine truth-seeker? Or is he a disinformation agent? This is a question that I’m sure bugs a lot of people who become interested in the flat earth subject. There are many differing opinions out there, and I myself have gone back and forth on the matter. Is it possible that the flat earth subject became popular on the internet, and Dubay was the “agent in place” ready to lead the movement? Yes, it’s possible. Remember that Lenin said, “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves,” a quote that Dubay happens to repeat often.

It’s hard to know when you all you have to judge by is what you see on the internet. I’m not a big fan of his rap videos or his in-your-face vegetarianism videos, which is a philosophy that I’m all for. But one thing in favor of Dubay being genuine is that his flat earth videos and other material is always right on the mark. This video below entitled “History of Flat Earth” is probably the best truth video I’ve ever seen. Everything presented in this video is simple common sense… common sense that we have almost lost contact with and forgotten. This video blows the lid off of the greatest lie in the history of mankind. If you’re interested in learning the truth, you owe it to yourself to watch this…

Brief Observations about the Moon Being Close and Satellites

The fact that anyone with a nice zoom camera can take — while standing on Earth — such a crisp, clear, detailed photo of the Moon seems to be yet another proof that the Moon is closer than we are told, and not 238,000 miles away. If it was that far away in “space,” then I highly doubt we would be able to see such fine details of the Moon’s surface from the Earth because we would be looking through so many miles of atmosphere, which would cloud the image. We can even see the details with our naked eye on many nights. This proof might not be the first thing you would tell a person who is new to flat earth, but it can be added as a curiosity to all of the other observable evidence.

But better yet, given all that I just said above about clear images of the Moon’s surface: If there are supposedly at least 2,000 Satellites (I have seen some sources say 20,000 — but let’s just say 2,000) orbiting around the Earth, wouldn’t we at least once in a while be able to witness, to observe, a Satellite pass between us and the Moon (especially a bright full Moon), and therefore be able to see the Satellite’s silhouette as it flies across the Moon’s surface from our perspective? Common sense says “Yes.” But in the ball-earth theory, lies are stacked upon other lies, which means that all common sense is lost, or we are expected to ignore our sense(s) and pretend that we feel ourselves spinning around at 1,000 miles per hour.

Crisp, clear photo of the Moon

NASA’s Fake Photos of the Earth Rising over the Moon

From Earth we only see one side of the Moon, and NASA’s Apollo Missions and other missions have landed on the side of the Moon that we see. Therefore, all photographs of the Earth from the Moon should have to be taken with the astronauts looking up into the sky. In other words, it would be impossible for the Earth to appear to rise above the distant disappearing horizon of the Moon because the same side of the Moon is always facing the Earth.

NASA's Fake Photos of Earth Rising

Here below is one of the fake photos from one of the hoax Apollo missions, from NASA’s official website:

NASA's Fake Photos of Earth Rising

And there have been many more supposed photos taken of the Earth rising since the Apollo missions. Here is another fake photo, this one of the Earth straddling the limb of the Moon, as seen from above “Compton crater.” Taken by the “Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.” Note the size difference of the Earth compared to the photo above. This comes from that bastion of truth known as Wikipedia (just so you know I’m not making this up):

NASA's fake photos

And just for good measure, here are a couple of photos from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, or JAXA. As far as I can tell this is from JAXA’s official website. The Earth sure does fluctuate in size quite a bit. But I’m sure there’s a perfectly good explanation for that:

JAXA fake space photo

Here’s a time-lapse of JAXA’s fake earthrise photos, also from their official website:

JAXA fake photos

Abu Dhabi to Fort Worth, Texas Flight Path

This graphic shows the path of a flight from Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates to Fort Worth, Texas, USA. The top graphic shows how the flight appears as it is tracked on a globe map. The bottom graphic shows how the flight path would look on a flat earth map. As you can see, the flight path on the ball earth map appears to take a strange northern loop and pass unnecessarily over land in the high northern latitudes. Why not just go in a straight line? On the flat earth map, however, the flight path going over land in the northern latitudes makes perfect sense, as it is a straight line from point A to point B.

Abu Dhabi to Ft. Worth Texas Flight Path