Flat Earth Perspectives Q&A Interview

I was contacted by a Spanish journalist who wanted to interview me about Flat Earth. He sent me some questions, which I answered, but it appears that he probably will not use my answers in his article.

Since I don’t want to have completely wasted my time, I thought I would post this little Q&A here on the blog…

May I ask you your sex/age?

I am a male, age 40.

Have you a university degree?

Yes, I have a 4-year Bachelor’s degree in Computer Science.

What is your daily job?

I work for a small non-profit organization in the Western United States.

When did you start with your blog?

I started my blog, entitled Flat Earth Perspectives, in February of 2016. I don’t consider it to be anything special. I’m just an ordinary guy trying my best to present this information.

Why did you launch it?

That’s a good question. When I first started looking into this “Flat Earth” issue, there were so many pieces of evidence and ideas out there that I found it difficult to organize all of them in my own head. And so I started my blog to help me organize my thoughts on the subject and to help me understand them. After a person discovers the flat earth ideas, even though there might be an instant sensing that you are finally seeing or hearing the truth, it still does take a while for the ideas to sink in because of all the past globe-earth conditioning. Although the blog currently has a pretty good amount of information, it is far from being a complete Encyclopedia of the flat earth topic. There is still much more to cover. I also launched the blog so that others might learn of this.

You told me in our email exchange, “One is considered insane for even considering Flat Earth, and yet it happens to be the truth”? Have you experienced this sort of backlash?ae-equidistant-projection-flat-earth

Yes, I have witnessed and experienced the ridicule that people have toward the subject of “flat earth.” Although I have not really been attacked personally or called “insane” directly, I have watched the reactions of people around me when the idea is brought up. Most people consider the subject to be completely ridiculous, not far from believing in the Easter Bunny or Santa Claus. I also thought Flat Earth was ridiculous before I started to look into it. The subject is intensely ridiculed and there is often even anger towards the idea. There is anger because people don’t want to even consider that they have been so thoroughly fooled, or that so many people that they previously trusted — so-called scientists, teachers, authority figures, etc. — have been purposefully lying or have been fooled themselves.

Do you speak your views on this subject with the people around you (family, friends…)?

Yes, I have spoken to a couple of family members and several friends about the subject. In general I do not speak about it because it is such a touchy subject, but I have introduced the topic to people who I have known to be willing to question what they have learned. After you discover flat earth, it is hard to keep it to yourself, and so you feel compelled to share with at least one other person. In general, the people who I have talked to have been able to consider the evidence with an open mind, but I leave it to them to draw their own conclusions.

Could you explain briefly what is the main idea regarding the earth that you present in your blog?

earthsI guess the main idea is that humanity has been lied to for centuries about the shape of the Earth, and that there is not one shred of physical, experiential, scientific, empirical evidence that the Earth is a sphere — all that globe earth theory has are fake images and outlandish, unproven theories. Meanwhile, there are hundreds upon hundreds of common sense, observable flat earth “proofs” that blow the ball-earth theory out of the water. It is all a matter of overcoming a lifetime of conditioning. I had to overcome it as well. But once you begin to break out of the conditioning, a whole lot of things about the current state of our world begin to make much more sense. The globe-earth deception is the biggest hoax of all time. It is a wide-ranging subject that effects more aspects of our lives than most people would imagine. It’s about more than just “the shape of the earth.”

What is the basis that you have to justify that earth is flat?

This is a difficult question to answer in just a short paragraph or two or three. There are hundreds of what we call “flat earth proofs.” Some of these proofs are direct or circumstantial evidence that we live on a plane as opposed to a sphere. Others are proofs in the sense that they expose the ball-earth lies. For instance, if I am able to show that NASA is trying to pass off a computer generated image as a real photo, then that is a proof in the sense that it shows a government agency lying to people about the shape of the Earth. All true flat earth proofs appeal to common sense in my opinion. Here are a couple of my favorite proofs…

No matter how high you go up into the air in a plane or in a hot-air balloon, the distant horizon always rises to the eye-level of the observer, and it is always perfectly horizontally flat all 360 degrees around the observer, showing absolutely no curvature. If the Earth were a ball, then the horizon would not rise to eye-level, and at some point the observer would have to look down to see the horizon.

I think my favorite flat earth proof is that Polaris, also known as The North Star, never moves from it’s position above the North Pole. The North Star always remains stationary, and all of the other stars make circular paths around it. If it was as the mainstream theory says, that stars are all suns and that they have all been moving at incredible Star_trails_over_the_ESO_3.6-metre_telescopespeeds through space for millions of years, then how could The North Star remain stationary relative to our observation point, and how could all of our stars make the same circular path around The North Star night after night, year after year? In addition, if all of these so-called “suns” are supposedly moving outward into space, how would it be possible that all of the stars in all of the constellations would remain in the same relative positions to one another throughout the history of humanity? In other words, wouldn’t the constellations as we know them change their shapes? So this means that the stars are not suns, and they are not traveling through “outer space” like we have been told by “science.”

Another one of my favorite proofs is that the high Northern Latitudes and the high Southern Latitudes have drastically different kinds of animal and plant life, and therefore different climates. If the Earth were a ball, then the same relative Northern and Southern latitudes would have similar amounts of life because both poles of the ball earth would be exposed to the Sun the same amount of time as the Earth revolves around the Sun in space. The actual fact is that high Southern latitudes have surprisingly little life, it is very desolate… while the Northern latitudes are surprisingly vibrant with life, with a longer period of relatively warm Summer than most people think.

When was the first time you heard or read about this?

The first time I heard about flat earth theory was about 18 months ago when I ran across it on the internet. I was investigating another hoax on someone’s website, and I noticed that he kept referring to flat earth. At first I laughed at it just like most people. Then for some reason — I can’t remember why, maybe just for a laugh? — I looked into the material he was presenting and I was blown away by the evidence. I knew I was seeing the truth, and yet still I was thinking to myself, “Am I crazy?” This is one reason why you feel compelled to tell others about this… just to make sure you’re not the only one who can see it.

How do you explain that the majority of people think that they know that the earth is a spheroid?

I have covered that a little bit already in a previous answer, but most people believe that they live on a ball-earth because they have been bombarded with ball-earth propaganda since the moment they were born — globes in the classroom, images from NASA, the Universal Studios trademark… it’s endless. It is very difficult to convince someone to take a look at evidence that is contrary to something that they believe so strongly, especially if it means that they have been duped. People don’t want to believe that they are so easily duped. People also don’t want to believe that there are those who could be so evil that they would deceive all of humanity for their own ends. Most people who believe that the Earth is a sphere probably could not tell you why they believe it… they would probably say something like, “Well, I’ve seen the pictures of the ball Earth from space. Of course it’s a globe.” But what they don’t know is that all of those images of a globe Earth are faked. Every last one of them.

Advertisements

Instances of NASA Hoaxes, Fakery and Deception

Do you actually believe that this contraption below was able to land on the Moon? And since NASA is lying about that, how can we believe anything they say? If they have the audacity to lie on a scale that large, doesn’t it then call into question everything they have ever said and done? Their claim that the Earth is a ball, for instance? And then doesn’t it follow logically that we then have to question the motives of any so-called “scientist,” government official, or anyone in a position of authority who has touted the goodness of NASA?

Lunar Landing Module Hoax

NASA Moon landing hoax

If you examine these two supposed images of Jupiter, one from 2014 and one from 2016, you will see that the cloud formations on the this giant so-called “planet” did not change in two years. I don’t know, maybe “gravity” explains why that is, as it seems to explain everything else. And check out that fake, magical, electrical light-show thing going on in the 2016 image. They really think we’re dumb (unfortunately, they’re kind of right about that).

Fake images of Jupiter

This meme below is self-explanatory. It is actually admitted by everyone that 99% of all international internet communications are handled by a vast network of undersea cables — check out my article about that here. If you asked most people how internet signals were handled across oceans, they would say “satellites.”

Arthur C. Clarke satellite fraud

In this image below, the famous supposed photo of Neil Armstrong’s first footprint on the Moon does not match the sole on the foot of his official spacesuit that is on display… not even close in fact.

Neil Armstrong fake moon landing

Here below is a press conference following the return of the first astronauts to land on the Moon. Are they just tired? Or are they tired of lying?

Apollo 11 press conference

How exactly would a rocket thruster work in the vacuum of space? And by the way, at what magical point does the atmosphere of Earth turn into the airless vacuum of space?

Fake space rockets

Fake space rockets

And here is lying free mason Buzz Aldrin being corrected as to how the Lunar Module worked. You’d think he would know that contraption inside-out, wouldn’t you?

Buzz Aldrin lying

And if you did not know, astronaut Gus Grissom was murdered after he stated publicly that basically there was no way we were going to land on the moon anytime soon. Here’s the story in a very brief nutshell…

Gus Grissom murdered by NASA

The image below shows the fact that you can adjust the lighting levels in Photoshop in some of NASA’s official photos, and you can clearly see cropping outlines (and lazy ones at that) which show that images have been pasted into the photo. In the case below, a fake image of the ball Earth has been pasted into the photo.

NASA photoshop fakery

NASA claims that they slow down the landing module with parachutes. No, really, that’s what they claim.

Slow down with parachutes

They expect us to believe that they had time to play some golf on the Moon, but not much time for taking very many photos.

Golf on the Moon

They expect us to believe that they took a car to the moon? How dumb are we? Really dumb, apparently.

car-on-moon

There have been multiple instances in which NASA astronauts and even President of the United States Barrack Obama have made strange comments revolving around the idea that we are only “able to fly in low Earth orbit. That’s the farther we can go.” Wait… what? Didn’t NASA travel to the Moon at a supposed distance from Earth of 238,900 miles, which is way past “low Earth orbit.” And by the way, there’s no such thing as “low Earth orbit.” Are they basically admitting that it never happened? That it was a hoax?

Can get past low earth orbit

An outline of the Disney character “Pluto” can actually be seen on an official image from NASA of the so-called planet Pluto.

Fake planet Pluto

Hey, check out this awesome image captured by NASA of the space station silhouetted against the sun during the August 2017 eclipse in North America. How could the space station possibly be fake? I mean, c’mon, there’s a photo right there! You can’t fake images like this! I kid, of course. But unfortunately NASA did fooled most of humanity with this ridiculous image. Why don’t we ever see photos of the space station silhouetted against a full Moon? Or why don’t we ever see any of the supposed thousands of satellites orbiting around the ball earth pass between us and a full Moon? Shouldn’t we be able to see the silhouette of a satellite or the space station at least once in a while?

space-station

Nikon P900 Digital Camera Zooming-In on Toronto Skyline (Video)

Taken from 30.84 Miles away at Fort Niagara, NY. The Rogers Center dome is only 282′ high. Lake Ontario elevation is 243′.The base elevation of the Rogers Center is 267′, making the total height of the Rogers Center above the lake 306′ . My elevation was 6′ above the lake. Expected curvature is 516.85′ of drop. Rogers Center should not have been visible. The Rogers Center, formerly know as Sky Dome, is the bright white building to the left of the famous CN Tower. From over 30 miles away, it should be below the Earth’s supposed curvature. The temperature of Toronto, Fort Niagara, and Lake Ontario were all within 5 degrees difference from each other and the humidity of the air in between did not exceed 40%. (Description from Jenna Fredo’s YouTube Channel. Check out her channel here.)

Did you know that there’s no such thing as “outer space”?

This meme below inspired me to make this post. There is no such thing as the “outer space” that we have been conditioned to believe in by charlatans who claim to be scientists. A “scientist” is someone who records data taken from direct observation, not someone who makes assumptions, then calls those assumptions facts, and uses that so-called fact as the basis for more and more so-called facts and theories.

Space Fraud

Observe this video below of a supposedly successful rocket launch. This is the very first video I chose, and it does exactly what the meme above depicts, which is that after initial launch, the rocket slowly goes horizontal, and then you can actually see it tilt back down. Yes… down, not up.

And then at about the 2:12 mark there is a convenient video edit that cuts to a view of the rocket showing a curved earth, but it is likely a fish-eye lens that bends the image. If you’re a flat earther, you already know that they use fish-eye lenses all the time to try to fool us into believing that we are seeing curvature.

Note the official-sounding conversation we’re hearing of the “scientists” and “technicians” who are overseeing this immensely important asteroid probe launch (what a joke that is). And note also that this launch is at night — could this be so that it isn’t so obvious that the rocket is just making a giant parabola and then coming back down into the ocean?

“What goes up, must come down”… sing it!

The History of Flat Earth (Video by Eric Dubay)

Is Eric Dubay a genuine truth-seeker? Or is he a disinformation agent? This is a question that I’m sure bugs a lot of people who become interested in the flat earth subject. There are many differing opinions out there, and I myself have gone back and forth on the matter. Is it possible that the flat earth subject became popular on the internet, and Dubay was the “agent in place” ready to lead the movement? Yes, it’s possible. Remember that Lenin said, “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves,” a quote that Dubay happens to repeat often.

It’s hard to know when you all you have to judge by is what you see on the internet. I’m not a big fan of his rap videos or his in-your-face vegetarianism videos, which is a philosophy that I’m all for. But one thing in favor of Dubay being genuine is that his flat earth videos and other material is always right on the mark. This video below entitled “History of Flat Earth” is probably the best truth video I’ve ever seen. Everything presented in this video is simple common sense… common sense that we have almost lost contact with and forgotten. This video blows the lid off of the greatest lie in the history of mankind. If you’re interested in learning the truth, you owe it to yourself to watch this…

Brief Observations about the Moon Being Close and Satellites

The fact that anyone with a nice zoom camera can take — while standing on Earth — such a crisp, clear, detailed photo of the Moon seems to be yet another proof that the Moon is closer than we are told, and not 238,000 miles away. If it was that far away in “space,” then I highly doubt we would be able to see such fine details of the Moon’s surface from the Earth because we would be looking through so many miles of atmosphere, which would cloud the image. We can even see the details with our naked eye on many nights. This proof might not be the first thing you would tell a person who is new to flat earth, but it can be added as a curiosity to all of the other observable evidence.

But better yet, given all that I just said above about clear images of the Moon’s surface: If there are supposedly at least 2,000 Satellites (I have seen some sources say 20,000 — but let’s just say 2,000) orbiting around the Earth, wouldn’t we at least once in a while be able to witness, to observe, a Satellite pass between us and the Moon (especially a bright full Moon), and therefore be able to see the Satellite’s silhouette as it flies across the Moon’s surface from our perspective? Common sense says “Yes.” But in the ball-earth theory, lies are stacked upon other lies, which means that all common sense is lost, or we are expected to ignore our sense(s) and pretend that we feel ourselves spinning around at 1,000 miles per hour.

Crisp, clear photo of the Moon

NASA’s Fake Photos of the Earth Rising over the Moon

From Earth we only see one side of the Moon, and NASA’s Apollo Missions and other missions have landed on the side of the Moon that we see. Therefore, all photographs of the Earth from the Moon should have to be taken with the astronauts looking up into the sky. In other words, it would be impossible for the Earth to appear to rise above the distant disappearing horizon of the Moon because the same side of the Moon is always facing the Earth.

NASA's Fake Photos of Earth Rising

Here below is one of the fake photos from one of the hoax Apollo missions, from NASA’s official website:

NASA's Fake Photos of Earth Rising

And there have been many more supposed photos taken of the Earth rising since the Apollo missions. Here is another fake photo, this one of the Earth straddling the limb of the Moon, as seen from above “Compton crater.” Taken by the “Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.” Note the size difference of the Earth compared to the photo above. This comes from that bastion of truth known as Wikipedia (just so you know I’m not making this up):

NASA's fake photos

And just for good measure, here are a couple of photos from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, or JAXA. As far as I can tell this is from JAXA’s official website. The Earth sure does fluctuate in size quite a bit. But I’m sure there’s a perfectly good explanation for that:

JAXA fake space photo

Here’s a time-lapse of JAXA’s fake earthrise photos, also from their official website:

JAXA fake photos