This meme below inspired me to make this post. There is no such thing as the “outer space” that we have been conditioned to believe in by charlatans who claim to be scientists. A “scientist” is someone who records data taken from direct observation, not someone who makes assumptions, then calls those assumptions facts, and uses that so-called fact as the basis for more and more so-called facts and theories.
Observe this video below of a supposedly successful rocket launch. This is the very first video I chose, and it does exactly what the meme above depicts, which is that after initial launch, the rocket slowly goes horizontal, and then you can actually see it tilt back down. Yes… down, not up.
And then at about the 2:12 mark there is a convenient video edit that cuts to a view of the rocket showing a curved earth, but it is likely a fish-eye lens that bends the image. If you’re a flat earther, you already know that they use fish-eye lenses all the time to try to fool us into believing that we are seeing curvature.
Note the official-sounding conversation we’re hearing of the “scientists” and “technicians” who are overseeing this immensely important asteroid probe launch (what a joke that is). And note also that this launch is at night — could this be so that it isn’t so obvious that the rocket is just making a giant parabola and then coming back down into the ocean?
“What goes up, must come down”… sing it!
Is Eric Dubay a genuine truth-seeker? Or is he a disinformation agent? This is a question that I’m sure bugs a lot of people who become interested in the flat earth subject. There are many differing opinions out there, and I myself have gone back and forth on the matter. Is it possible that the flat earth subject became popular on the internet, and Dubay was the “agent in place” ready to lead the movement? Yes, it’s possible. Remember that Lenin said, “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves,” a quote that Dubay happens to repeat often.
It’s hard to know when you all you have to judge by is what you see on the internet. I’m not a big fan of his rap videos or his in-your-face vegetarianism videos, which is a philosophy that I’m all for. But one thing in favor of Dubay being genuine is that his flat earth videos and other material is always right on the mark. This video below entitled “History of Flat Earth” is probably the best truth video I’ve ever seen. Everything presented in this video is simple common sense… common sense that we have almost lost contact with and forgotten. This video blows the lid off of the greatest lie in the history of mankind. If you’re interested in learning the truth, you owe it to yourself to watch this…
Before common sense was replaced by love of money and stupidity, cannabis was used as a medicine for many ailments. If you’re only image of cannabis is of the stoners from Dazed and Confused, then you’ve been successfully propagandized by the devils who profit from human suffering.
Edit: I’m adding this video below after somebody made an ignorant, sarcastic comment that was basically saying that Cannabis is not “medicine.” The boy and his father in this video might disagree with that. Although stay tuned to the very end of the video, and you’ll see that Barbara Bush agrees wholeheartedly with the guy who commented…
The fact that anyone with a nice zoom camera can take — while standing on Earth — such a crisp, clear, detailed photo of the Moon seems to be yet another proof that the Moon is closer than we are told, and not 238,000 miles away. If it was that far away in “space,” then I highly doubt we would be able to see such fine details of the Moon’s surface from the Earth because we would be looking through so many miles of atmosphere, which would cloud the image. We can even see the details with our naked eye on many nights. This proof might not be the first thing you would tell a person who is new to flat earth, but it can be added as a curiosity to all of the other observable evidence.
But better yet, given all that I just said above about clear images of the Moon’s surface: If there are supposedly at least 2,000 Satellites (I have seen some sources say 20,000 — but let’s just say 2,000) orbiting around the Earth, wouldn’t we at least once in a while be able to witness, to observe, a Satellite pass between us and the Moon (especially a bright full Moon), and therefore be able to see the Satellite’s silhouette as it flies across the Moon’s surface from our perspective? Common sense says “Yes.” But in the ball-earth theory, lies are stacked upon other lies, which means that all common sense is lost, or we are expected to ignore our sense(s) and pretend that we feel ourselves spinning around at 1,000 miles per hour.
From Earth we only see one side of the Moon, and NASA’s Apollo Missions and other missions have landed on the side of the Moon that we see. Therefore, all photographs of the Earth from the Moon should have to be taken with the astronauts looking up into the sky. In other words, it would be impossible for the Earth to appear to rise above the distant disappearing horizon of the Moon because the same side of the Moon is always facing the Earth.
Here below is one of the fake photos from one of the hoax Apollo missions, from NASA’s official website:
And there have been many more supposed photos taken of the Earth rising since the Apollo missions. Here is another fake photo, this one of the Earth straddling the limb of the Moon, as seen from above “Compton crater.” Taken by the “Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.” Note the size difference of the Earth compared to the photo above. This comes from that bastion of truth known as Wikipedia (just so you know I’m not making this up):
And just for good measure, here are a couple of photos from the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency, or JAXA. As far as I can tell this is from JAXA’s official website. The Earth sure does fluctuate in size quite a bit. But I’m sure there’s a perfectly good explanation for that:
Here’s a time-lapse of JAXA’s fake earthrise photos, also from their official website:
This graphic shows the path of a flight from Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates to Fort Worth, Texas, USA. The top graphic shows how the flight appears as it is tracked on a globe map. The bottom graphic shows how the flight path would look on a flat earth map. As you can see, the flight path on the ball earth map appears to take a strange northern loop and pass unnecessarily over land in the high northern latitudes. Why not just go in a straight line? On the flat earth map, however, the flight path going over land in the northern latitudes makes perfect sense, as it is a straight line from point A to point B.
If the Earth is a sphere (or an oblate spheroid), and the two supposed poles of the ball Earth are perpetually covered with ice and experience extreme freezing cold temperatures, then why doesn’t the dark side of the supposed ball Earth experience extreme cold temperatures every night when it is facing away from the sun as the Earth spins on its axis? The distance between the Sun and the equator at night, for instance, would be far greater than the distance of the poles from the Sun, and therefore should experience extreme drops in temperature. But that does not happen. As we all know, temperatures at the equator at night usually don’t reach the freezing point.